Solar Panel Cost in Yakima, WA 2026: ~19.3-Year Payback
In Yakima, WA, an 8 kW system at $2.55/W produces about 1,320 kWh per kW and pays back in roughly 19.3 years at 11.08¢/kWh with the federal credit at $0.
· Source: EIA Electric Power Monthly Table 5.6.A (July 2026 data) · next EIA update ~Oct 23
On this page: CalculatorTableHow we calculatedSources
Jump to calculator ↓The slider reprices the calculator above instantly, and the URL keeps your scenario — share it as-is.
- Yakima production
- 1,320 kWh/kW/yr
- Washington average
- 1,045 kWh/kW/yr
- Electricity rate
- 14.7¢/kWh
- 8 kW installed cost
- ~$20,400
- 2026 federal credit
- $0
- Payback (utility math)
- 19.3 years
Why this number
Yakima produces 1,320 kWh per kW against Seattle’s 1,086 — 22% more, on the same hardware, under the same net-metering statute. The payback still runs 19.3 years, because Yakima’s utility, Pacific Power, bills only 11.08¢/kWh — cheap enough to swallow the whole sunshine advantage. The Cascade crest changed the sky; the bill is another story.
Washington is not one solar market
Across the 6 Washington cities with their own modeled figures, production spans 32% — Everett at 999 kWh per kW to Yakima at 1,320. Every column except production is identical down this table: same 14.7¢/kWh retail rate, same export regime, same $2.55/W installed cost. The payback differences are caused by weather and nothing else.
| Location | kWh per kW per year | 8 kW output | Annual value | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yakima (this page) | 1,320 | 9,504 kWh | $1,398 | 15.1 yrs |
| Spokane | 1,195 | 8,604 kWh | $1,266 | 16.5 yrs |
| Seattle | 1,086 | 7,819 kWh | $1,150 | 17.9 yrs |
| Tacoma | 1,046 | 7,531 kWh | $1,108 | 18.5 yrs |
| Bellingham | 1,022 | 7,358 kWh | $1,082 | 18.9 yrs |
| Everett | 999 | 7,193 kWh | $1,058 | 19.2 yrs |
| Washington state average | 1,045 | 7,524 kWh | $1,107 | 18.5 yrs |
Against the state figure, Yakima runs 26% above Washington’s 1,045 kWh per kW — a payback 0.8 years longer than the statewide 18.5-year estimate on the same hardware at the same price.
East of the Cascades is a different climate entirely
Pacific moisture rises over the Cascades, precipitates on the western slope, and descends dry into the Columbia Basin. Yakima sits in that shadow: roughly eight inches of annual precipitation, hot clear summers, and cold clear winters. It has more in common climatically with eastern Oregon than with the Puget Sound cities it shares a state government with.
At 1,320 kWh per kW, Yakima sits essentially on the national planning figure of 1,328 — a genuinely ordinary solar location, which in Washington makes it exceptional. Winter fog in the basin is the one local penalty worth knowing about; it can persist for days under an inversion.
Your utility, officially
Washington’s average residential rate is 14.7¢/kWh, but the bill in Yakima comes from PacifiCorp (Pacific Power, WA) at 11.08¢ — 25% below the state figure. These are the residential figures Yakima’s utility reported to the U.S. Energy Information Administration on Form EIA-861 for 2024 — computed as revenue ÷ sales from the official file, not estimated:
| Utility | EIA ID | Residential avg price | Residential customers | Net-metering (residential, self-reported) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PacifiCorp (Pacific Power, WA) | 14354 | 11.08¢/kWh | 114,453 | not reported |
How exports are treated matters as much as the headline price: PacifiCorp (Pacific Power, WA) is modeled here under the state’s full-retail net metering rules, and that treatment is baked into every payback figure on this page.
Yakima has the sun that Puget Sound cities dream about and the electricity price that keeps solar salespeople honest. The utility is Pacific Power — PacifiCorp’s Washington operation, an investor-owned utility with 114,453 residential customers in the state — billing a 2024 EIA-861 average of just 11.08¢/kWh. Among the Washington utilities we track, only municipal Tacoma Power, at 10.81¢, is cheaper; Seattle City Light averages 14.09¢ and Puget Sound Energy 14.63¢. Hydropower country keeps bills low, and low bills are the fundamental headwind for solar economics everywhere they occur.
The resource, though, is genuinely good. East of the Cascade crest, in the rain shadow, Yakima yields 1,320 kWh per kW of unshaded south-facing capacity — 22% more than Seattle’s 1,086, 10% more than Spokane’s 1,195, and within sight of sun-belt numbers that no one associates with Washington State. Run the two figures together and you get the honest headline: at full retail, a Yakima kilowatt of capacity displaces about $146 of electricity a year. That is real money, but it is what 11-cent power does to strong sunshine — for comparison, the same yield at Puget Sound Energy’s rate would be worth nearly a third more.
The rules are the good news. As an investor-owned, state-regulated utility, Pacific Power is bound by RCW 80.60, Washington’s net-metering statute, which credits residential exports at the full retail rate — an exported kilowatt-hour cancels a purchased one at par, no battery or load-shifting required. The caveat is not small, and we will not bury it: the statute’s sunset is approaching, and several Washington utilities have already hit the law’s 4% capacity cap and moved new customers onto successor tariffs. Statewide practice is now mixed. Before you sign anything, confirm with Pacific Power in writing that new interconnections in its Washington territory still receive full-retail netting, and ask what the successor terms would be. Pacific Power also reported no residential net-metering counts to EIA for 2024, so we cannot show how much room remains under any cap.
The incentive ledger is short. The federal §25D residential credit is $0 for 2026 cash and loan purchases — it expired December 31, 2025 — and Washington offers no state solar tax credit or rebate. The state’s one meaningful contribution is a 6.5% sales-tax exemption, worth real money up front; there is no property-tax exemption for solar in Washington. EnergySage install quotes average $2.55/W statewide, on the cheap side nationally. Put together: modest returns, honest rules for now, and a payback that depends more on locking in today’s net-metering terms than on anything the weather does. Size to your own load and get the tariff question answered first.
Source: EIA Form EIA-861, 2024 final release , accessed 2026-09-02. Average price is total residential revenue divided by total residential sales for the year — your own rate depends on your tariff and usage tier.
An 8 kW system in Yakima, priced out
| Metric | Estimate for Yakima | Washington statewide |
|---|---|---|
| Production, unshaded 20° south | 1,320 kWh per kW/yr | 1,045 kWh per kW/yr |
| 8 kW output after a 10% roof derate | ~9,504 kWh/yr | ~7,524 kWh/yr |
| Average residential rate | 14.7¢/kWh (EIA) | 14.7¢/kWh |
| Installed cost, 8 kW | ~$20,400 at $2.55/watt | ~$20,400 |
| 2026 federal credit | $0 | $0 |
| Export rule | Full-retail net metering | Full-retail net metering |
| Export credit modeled | retail (14.7¢/kWh) | retail (14.7¢/kWh) |
| Annual value of that output | ~$1,398 | ~$1,107 |
| Rough payback (your utility) | 19.3 years | 18.5 years (state-average model) |
| 25-year net position | $18,558 | — |
Only the first two rows differ. Everything financial — rate, tariff, price per watt — is inherited from Washington without change, which is the point: a city page that quietly used a different electricity rate from its state page would be guessing, not measuring.
Doing nothing is not free either. Twenty-five years of the electricity an 8 kW Yakima array would produce, with rates rising at 2.5% a year, comes to roughly $47,753.
Electricity isn’t only for panels — the heat pump vs. furnace cost calculator compares heating costs at Yakima’s own 14.7¢/kWh rate.
Run it with your own bill
Shared methodology · identical on every city page
- Production figures are unshaded, south-facing, 20° PVGIS values. A real roof — its own pitch, orientation, a tree or a chimney — typically produces 10–25% less; every payback here already carries a 10% real-roof derate.
- Paybacks include $150/yr of running costs and one $2,000 inverter replacement in year 14, which is why they run longer than paybacks quoted elsewhere.
- State export rules cover investor-owned, state-regulated utilities. Municipal utilities and rural electric cooperatives are exempt in most states and set their own terms.
- Installed cost is the state-level EnergySage market figure, not a city quote; a swing of 50¢/W moves payback by roughly a year and a half either way. Get three quotes before trusting any payback — including ours.
Cheap power is what holds this back
Yakima’s problem is not sunshine, it is cheap power: Pacific Power bills 11.08¢/kWh here — among the cheapest rates in the country, courtesy of the Columbia River hydro system. A kilowatt-hour you avoid buying here is worth less than half what the same kilowatt-hour is worth in New York or California.
This is the mirror image of the Eureka case on this site: Eureka has bad sun and expensive power and pays back in 11.9 years; Yakima has decent sun and cheap power and takes 19.3. Rate beats sunshine, almost every time.
Much of the Yakima Valley is served by public utility districts and co-ops rather than by an investor-owned utility, so the statutory net-metering rule may not apply to you at all. That is the first thing to check here.
What Washington pays Yakima for exported power
Washington credits exported power at the retail rate under RCW 80.60 , so a kilowatt-hour a Yakima array sends to the grid is worth the same as one you buy. That is the best case for solar economics and it is why the payback above is what it is.
It is also the assumption most likely to change. Twenty-two states have already moved to net billing. If Washington did the same on typical terms, this system would take about 24.2 years instead of 19.3 — 4.9 years’ difference from a policy change, with no change to the hardware and none to Yakima’s weather.
Full retail in statute, but several utilities have hit the 4% cap and moved to successor tariffs, so practice is mixed.
Sources and method
- Production: modeled with PVGIS v5.2 PVcalc (European Commission JRC) using the PVGIS-NSRDB radiation database — the same NREL satellite dataset PVWatts draws on for the Americas. Assumptions: 4 kWp, standard c-Si, 14% system loss, roof mounting, 20-degree tilt, due south, horizon shading on. The 1,320 kWh per kW figure for Yakima is a modeled location point, not an interpolation from the Washington average. PVGIS is free to use with JRC attribution requested; the underlying NSRDB is public domain (NREL/DOE).
- Real-roof derate: a separate 10% deduction for azimuth, pitch and shading, applied in the shared model rather than folded into the production data — so you can adjust it if your roof is genuinely unobstructed.
- Electricity rate: U.S. Energy Information Administration, average price by state . This is Washington’s residential average; EIA does not publish a Yakima figure, so the state rate is used and labeled as such.
- Export rules: RCW 80.60 , from our Washington state page and the shared export-rules dataset behind it.
- State average rate: EIA Table 5.6.A, July 2026 data (released Sep 2026), used for every state-average comparison on this page.
- Payback model: shared with the solar savings calculator and the state pages — 2.5%/yr utility inflation, 0.5%/yr degradation, $150/yr running costs, one $2,000 inverter replacement in year 14, federal credit $0. The rest of the toolset — battery, sizing, financing — is under all calculators .
- Incentives: DSIRE . City and utility programs change more often than state ones — check yours directly.
Electricity rate, export regime, production figure and installed cost on this page were last verified on 30 August 2026. Export credits reset on annual tariff cycles and incentive budgets run out mid-year, so treat every figure as a snapshot at that date and confirm current terms before acting. Nothing here is tax or financial advice.
Frequently asked questions
How much do solar panels cost in Yakima in 2026?
About $20,400 for a typical 8 kW system at $2.55 per watt, before any incentive. With the federal credit at $0 in 2026 that is close to your net cost. Note that the price per watt is a Washington market average — there is no reliable city-level cost data, so treat it as a starting point and get three quotes.
What is the solar payback in Yakima?
Roughly 19.3 years on this model, using Yakima’s own production figure of 1,320 kWh per kW and its own utility tariff (11.08¢/kWh) with each utility’s real export treatment. That includes $150 a year of running costs and one inverter replacement, which many published paybacks leave out.
Is Yakima better or worse for solar than the rest of Washington?
Against the state figure, Yakima runs 26% above Washington’s 1,045 kWh per kW — a payback 0.8 years longer than the statewide 18.5-year estimate on the same hardware at the same price.
Is solar worth it in Yakima in 2026?
Yakima is the best solar location in Washington in our data — 1,320 kWh per kW, 22% ahead of Seattle. Payback is still about 19.3 years, because 11.08¢/kWh power limits what any array can be worth.
How we calculated this
Year-1 saving = production (kW × the city’s modeled kWh per kW) × the blended kWh value (retail rate for self-use, the state export rule for exports). Payback = net cost ÷ year-1 saving, with the federal credit at $0 for 2026 purchases and cost per watt from the state’s installed-price band. Production is modeled from PVGIS/NSRDB irradiance for the city.Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) electricity rates · DSIRE incentive records · public IRS/OBBBA guidance. Figures are modeled estimates, not quotes or tax advice. See our methodology.
Compare with the rest of Washington
- Solar panel cost in Washington — The statewide picture: Washington’s rate, incentives, export rules and the 1,045 kWh per kW average this page corrects.
- Solar panel cost in Spokane — 1,195 kWh per kW and a 16.5-year payback — worse than Yakima on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Seattle — 1,086 kWh per kW and a 17.9-year payback — worse than Yakima on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Tacoma — 1,046 kWh per kW and a 18.5-year payback — worse than Yakima on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Bellingham — 1,022 kWh per kW and a 18.9-year payback — worse than Yakima on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Everett — 999 kWh per kW and a 19.2-year payback — worse than Yakima on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Philadelphia — 1,320 kWh per kW in Pennsylvania — the closest production match to Yakima in our data.
- Solar panel cost in Medford — 1,316 kWh per kW in Oregon — the closest production match to Yakima in our data.
- All city solar figures — The 66 US cities with their own modeled production data, and the spreads between them.