How Much Is Solar in Tampa, FL? $2.13/W, 10.7-Yr Payback
In Tampa, FL, an 8 kW system at $2.13/W produces about 1,498 kWh per kW and pays back in roughly 10.7 years at 14.67¢/kWh with the federal credit at $0.
· Source: EIA Electric Power Monthly Table 5.6.A (July 2026 data) · next EIA update ~Oct 23
On this page: CalculatorTableHow we calculatedSources
Jump to calculator ↓The slider reprices the calculator above instantly, and the URL keeps your scenario — share it as-is.
- Tampa production
- 1,498 kWh/kW/yr
- Florida average
- 1,475 kWh/kW/yr
- Electricity rate
- 15.0¢/kWh
- 8 kW installed cost
- ~$17,040
- 2026 federal credit
- $0
- Payback (utility math)
- 10.7 years
Why this number
A kilowatt of panels in Tampa produces about 1,498 kWh a year, the highest of the 4 Florida cities modeled here — ahead of Miami at 1,481, Orlando at 1,458, Jacksonville at 1,416. On an 8 kW system that is a payback of about 10.4 years, against 11.0 years in Jacksonville, on identical hardware at the same 15.03¢/kWh.
Tampa against the rest of Florida
Across the 4 Florida cities with their own modeled figures, production spans 5.8% — Jacksonville at 1,416 kWh per kW to Tampa at 1,498. Every column except production is identical down this table: same 15.0¢/kWh retail rate, same export regime, same $2.13/W installed cost. The payback differences are caused by weather and nothing else.
| Location | kWh per kW per year | 8 kW output | Annual value | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tampa (this page) | 1,498 | 10,786 kWh | $1,621 | 10.4 yrs |
| Miami | 1,481 | 10,663 kWh | $1,603 | 10.6 yrs |
| Orlando | 1,458 | 10,498 kWh | $1,578 | 10.7 yrs |
| Jacksonville | 1,416 | 10,195 kWh | $1,532 | 11.0 yrs |
| Florida state average | 1,475 | 10,620 kWh | $1,596 | 10.6 yrs |
Against the state figure, Tampa is the reference point: our Florida page uses 1,475 kWh per kW, which is this city. The value of this page is the comparison above, not a different headline number.
What sets Tampa apart
Marginally ahead of Miami, with a slightly shorter afternoon thunderstorm season.
Your utility, officially
Florida’s average residential rate is 15.0¢/kWh, but the bill in Tampa comes from Tampa Electric Co at 14.67¢ — 2.4% below the state figure. These are the residential figures Tampa’s utility reported to the U.S. Energy Information Administration on Form EIA-861 for 2024 — computed as revenue ÷ sales from the official file, not estimated:
| Utility | EIA ID | Residential avg price | Residential customers | Net-metering (residential, self-reported) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tampa Electric Co | 18454 | 14.67¢/kWh | 757,280 | not reported |
How exports are treated matters as much as the headline price: Tampa Electric Co is modeled here under the state’s full-retail net metering rules, and that treatment is baked into every payback figure on this page.
Tampa Electric is an oddity among Florida’s big utilities: it is essentially a one-metro company. Its 757,280 residential customers sit almost entirely in Hillsborough County and its immediate edges, which makes it a fraction of the size of Florida Power & Light (5.2 million homes) to its south and Duke Energy Florida (1.8 million) to its north. On price it sits between them too — 14.67¢/kWh on the 2024 EIA-861 file, against FPL’s 13.71¢ and Duke’s 16.63¢. Cross the bay to St. Petersburg and you are in Duke territory paying about 2¢ more per kilowatt-hour; the utility boundary, not the weather, is the biggest solar variable in the Tampa Bay area.
Ownership matters here in a straightforward way. Tampa Electric is investor-owned, regulated by the Florida Public Service Commission, and therefore bound by the state’s full-retail net-metering rule (FAC Rule 25-6.065, dating to 2008) that our Florida page describes. Exported energy from a home system is credited against consumption at the retail rate. That is the same regime as FPL and Duke — Florida’s investor-owned utilities are genuinely uniform on this — and it is the municipal utilities in Jacksonville and Orlando that get to write their own rules. Tampa Electric publishes its residential tariffs and interconnection process on its own site at tampaelectric.com ; we could not verify a deeper stable link to the specific net-metering page, so start from the homepage and confirm the current application steps there.
On rate structure, be careful with any single-number quote. A Tampa Electric residential bill is built from a base energy charge plus fuel and other cost-recovery clauses that the commission adjusts, so your effective per-kilowatt-hour price moves over time and varies with the tariff you are on. The 14.67¢ figure is the honest average — total residential revenue over total residential sales for 2024 — not a promise about your next bill.
One gap in the data is itself informative: the 2024 EIA net-metering file in our dataset carries residential totals for FPL (108,585 customers) and Duke (94,005) but none for Tampa Electric, so there is no honest way to say how many Tampa homes have interconnected solar or how the uptake compares across the bay. If you want that number, the utility is the only source — ask for it when you request interconnection, because a utility’s queue length tells you something about how practiced its approval process is.
Source: EIA Form EIA-861, 2024 final release , accessed 2026-09-02. Average price is total residential revenue divided by total residential sales for the year — your own rate depends on your tariff and usage tier.
Who else serves the metro
Tampa Electric covers the core of the city, yet its four-county EIA-861 area also includes Duke Energy Florida at 16.6¢, Sumter Electric Cooperative at 13.1¢, and Withlacoochee River Electric Cooperative and Peace River Electric Cooperative, both at 12.3¢. Against Tampa Electric’s 14.67¢, that’s roughly a 2.4¢ drop to the cooperatives and a 1.9¢ climb to Duke — a modest but real spread that can shift a solar payback timeline once a different rate and export policy come into play. Florida’s July 2026 state average, 15.03¢, is a later figure calculated differently than these 2024 numbers. Whether an address falls on Tampa Electric or a neighboring cooperative comes down to ZIP code.
| Utility (EIA-861, same service counties) | 2024 avg residential price | Residential customers |
|---|---|---|
| Duke Energy Florida, LLC | 16.6¢/kWh | 1,793,067 |
| Withlacoochee River Elec Coop | 12.3¢/kWh | 229,375 |
| Peace River Electric Coop, Inc | 12.3¢/kWh | 57,589 |
| Sumter Electric Coop, Inc | 13.1¢/kWh | 228,855 |
The exact answer is a ZIP question, not a city question: look up your utility by ZIP . Candidates: utilities EIA-861 lists in 4 service counties of the metro’s main utility; prices are 2024 revenue ÷ sales from the official file.
An 8 kW system in Tampa, priced out
| Metric | Estimate for Tampa | Florida statewide |
|---|---|---|
| Production, unshaded 20° south | 1,498 kWh per kW/yr | 1,475 kWh per kW/yr |
| 8 kW output after a 10% roof derate | ~10,786 kWh/yr | ~10,620 kWh/yr |
| Average residential rate | 15.0¢/kWh (EIA) | 15.0¢/kWh |
| Installed cost, 8 kW | ~$17,040 at $2.13/watt | ~$17,040 |
| 2026 federal credit | $0 | $0 |
| Export rule | Full-retail net metering | Full-retail net metering |
| Export credit modeled | retail (15.0¢/kWh) | retail (15.0¢/kWh) |
| Annual value of that output | ~$1,621 | ~$1,596 |
| Rough payback (your utility) | 10.7 years | 10.6 years (state-average model) |
| 25-year net position | $29,051 | — |
Only the first two rows differ. Everything financial — rate, tariff, price per watt — is inherited from Florida without change, which is the point: a city page that quietly used a different electricity rate from its state page would be guessing, not measuring.
Doing nothing is not free either. Twenty-five years of the electricity an 8 kW Tampa array would produce, with rates rising at 2.5% a year, comes to roughly $55,370.
Not sure solar is the right move yet? The should-I-go-solar screener asks the four questions that matter before you get a quote.
Run it with your own bill
Shared methodology · identical on every city page
- Production figures are unshaded, south-facing, 20° PVGIS values. A real roof — its own pitch, orientation, a tree or a chimney — typically produces 10–25% less; every payback here already carries a 10% real-roof derate.
- Paybacks include $150/yr of running costs and one $2,000 inverter replacement in year 14, which is why they run longer than paybacks quoted elsewhere.
- State export rules cover investor-owned, state-regulated utilities. Municipal utilities and rural electric cooperatives are exempt in most states and set their own terms.
- Installed cost is the state-level EnergySage market figure, not a city quote; a swing of 50¢/W moves payback by roughly a year and a half either way. Get three quotes before trusting any payback — including ours.
Tampa against the rest of Florida
Same rate, same export rule, same installed price per watt — only the sunshine changes:
| City | kWh per kW | Payback |
|---|---|---|
| Tampa | 1,498 | 10.4 years |
| Miami | 1,481 | 10.6 years |
| Orlando | 1,458 | 10.7 years |
| Jacksonville | 1,416 | 11.0 years |
A 5.8% production span across one state is the reason a single statewide number is only ever a starting point.
What Florida pays Tampa for exported power
Florida credits exported power at the retail rate under FAC Rule 25-6.065 , in force since 2008, so a kilowatt-hour a Tampa array sends to the grid is worth the same as one you buy. That is the best case for solar economics and it is why the payback above is what it is.
It is also the assumption most likely to change. Twenty-two states have already moved to net billing. If Florida did the same on typical terms, this system would take about 18.6 years instead of 10.7 — 7.9 years’ difference from a policy change, with no change to the hardware and none to Tampa’s weather.
Sources and method
- Production: modeled with PVGIS v5.2 PVcalc (European Commission JRC) using the PVGIS-NSRDB radiation database — the same NREL satellite dataset PVWatts draws on for the Americas. Assumptions: 4 kWp, standard c-Si, 14% system loss, roof mounting, 20-degree tilt, due south, horizon shading on. The 1,498 kWh per kW figure for Tampa is a modeled location point, not an interpolation from the Florida average. PVGIS is free to use with JRC attribution requested; the underlying NSRDB is public domain (NREL/DOE).
- Real-roof derate: a separate 10% deduction for azimuth, pitch and shading, applied in the shared model rather than folded into the production data — so you can adjust it if your roof is genuinely unobstructed.
- Electricity rate: U.S. Energy Information Administration, average price by state . This is Florida’s residential average; EIA does not publish a Tampa figure, so the state rate is used and labeled as such.
- Export rules: FAC Rule 25-6.065 , from our Florida state page and the shared export-rules dataset behind it.
- State average rate: EIA Table 5.6.A, July 2026 data (released Sep 2026), used for every state-average comparison on this page.
- Payback model: shared with the solar savings calculator and the state pages — 2.5%/yr utility inflation, 0.5%/yr degradation, $150/yr running costs, one $2,000 inverter replacement in year 14, federal credit $0. The rest of the toolset — battery, sizing, financing — is under all calculators .
- Incentives: DSIRE . City and utility programs change more often than state ones — check yours directly.
Electricity rate, export regime, production figure and installed cost on this page were last verified on 30 August 2026. Export credits reset on annual tariff cycles and incentive budgets run out mid-year, so treat every figure as a snapshot at that date and confirm current terms before acting. Nothing here is tax or financial advice.
Frequently asked questions
How much do solar panels cost in Tampa in 2026?
About $17,040 for a typical 8 kW system at $2.13 per watt, before any incentive. With the federal credit at $0 in 2026 that is close to your net cost. Note that the price per watt is a Florida market average — there is no reliable city-level cost data, so treat it as a starting point and get three quotes.
What is the solar payback in Tampa?
Roughly 10.7 years on this model, using Tampa’s own production figure of 1,498 kWh per kW and its own utility tariff (14.67¢/kWh) with each utility’s real export treatment. That includes $150 a year of running costs and one inverter replacement, which many published paybacks leave out.
Is Tampa better or worse for solar than the rest of Florida?
Against the state figure, Tampa is the reference point: our Florida page uses 1,475 kWh per kW, which is this city. The value of this page is the comparison above, not a different headline number.
Is solar worth it in Tampa in 2026?
At 15.03¢/kWh and 1,498 kWh per kW, an 8 kW system in Tampa pays back in about 10.4 years on this model. Treat that as a starting point for reading real quotes rather than as a quote: your roof’s orientation, its shading and the price you are actually offered will move it more than your city does.
How we calculated this
Year-1 saving = production (kW × the city’s modeled kWh per kW) × the blended kWh value (retail rate for self-use, the state export rule for exports). Payback = net cost ÷ year-1 saving, with the federal credit at $0 for 2026 purchases and cost per watt from the state’s installed-price band. Production is modeled from PVGIS/NSRDB irradiance for the city.Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) electricity rates · DSIRE incentive records · public IRS/OBBBA guidance. Figures are modeled estimates, not quotes or tax advice. See our methodology.
Compare with the rest of Florida
- Solar panel cost in Florida — The statewide picture: Florida’s rate, incentives, export rules and the 1,475 kWh per kW average this page corrects.
- Solar panel cost in Miami — 1,481 kWh per kW and a 10.6-year payback — worse than Tampa on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Orlando — 1,458 kWh per kW and a 10.7-year payback — worse than Tampa on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Jacksonville — 1,416 kWh per kW and a 11.0-year payback — worse than Tampa on identical hardware.
- Solar panel cost in Denver — 1,494 kWh per kW in Colorado — the closest production match to Tampa in our data.
- Solar panel cost in Salt Lake City — 1,486 kWh per kW in Utah — the closest production match to Tampa in our data.
- All city solar figures — The 66 US cities with their own modeled production data, and the spreads between them.