Net Metering by State: Full-Retail vs Net Billing (2026 Table)
- Regimes tracked
- Full retail, net billing, avoided cost, none
- Coverage
- 50 states plus DC
- Scope limit
- IOUs — most munis and co-ops excluded
- Per-row detail
- Program, effective date, source link
- Export value
- Published ¢ where the rule states one
- Verify
- Follow each row's source before signing
Net metering is fifty different policies wearing one name. The table below calls each state what it actually is — with the program, the date, and the primary source — so a quote’s “net metering” claim can be checked in one line.
All 51 jurisdictions
| State | Regime | Program | Effective | Export ¢ | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Utility-dependent (no statewide rule) (verify) | Alabama Power Rate PAE | 2026-03 | — | DSIRE list |
| Alaska | Avoided cost | RCA Net Metering | 2010 | — | DSIRE list |
| Arizona | Net billing | Resource Comparison Proxy (RCP) | 2016 | — | source |
| Arkansas | Net billing | Act 278 of 2023 | 2024-09-30 | — | DSIRE list |
| California | Net billing | Net Billing Tariff (NEM 3.0) | 2023-04-15 | 6.5¢ | source |
| Colorado | Full-retail net metering | C.R.S. 40-2-124 | 2004 | — | source |
| Connecticut | Net billing | Residential Renewable Energy Solutions | 2022-01 | — | DSIRE list |
| Delaware | Full-retail net metering | Delaware net metering (SB 298) | SB 298 | — | DSIRE list |
| District of Columbia | Full-retail net metering | D.C. Code 34-1518 | long-standing | — | DSIRE list |
| Florida | Full-retail net metering | FAC Rule 25-6.065 | 2008 | — | source |
| Georgia | Net billing | Georgia Power RNR, instantaneous netting | 2026 | 3.2188¢ | source |
| Hawaii | Net billing | Smart Renewable Energy (SRE) Export | 2024-10-01 | 13.5¢ | source |
| Idaho | Net billing | Idaho Power Export Credit Rate | 2025-09-30 | 8.0¢ | DSIRE list |
| Illinois | Net billing | supply-only net metering | 2025-01-01 | — | source |
| Indiana | Net billing | Excess Distributed Generation (EDG) | 2022-07-01 | — | DSIRE list |
| Iowa | Net billing | inflow/outflow DG tariffs (SF 583) | 2020 | — | DSIRE list |
| Kansas | Net billing | K.S.A. 66-1265 | 2014-07-01 | — | DSIRE list |
| Kentucky | Net billing | Net Metering Rate Rider (SB 100) | 2021-09-25 | 6.924¢ | DSIRE list |
| Louisiana | Avoided cost | LPSC Distributed Generation Rules | 2019-12-31 | — | DSIRE list |
| Maine | Full-retail net metering | Net Energy Billing (LD 1777) | 2025-06-27 | — | DSIRE list |
| Maryland | Full-retail net metering | Net metering; successor program mandated by HB 1532 | 2026-07-01 | — | source |
| Massachusetts | Full-retail net metering (verify) | 220 CMR 18.04 | unclear | — | source |
| Michigan | Net billing | Distributed Generation Program | 2019-05-09 | — | source |
| Minnesota | Full-retail net metering | Minn. Stat. 216B.164 | long-standing | — | source |
| Mississippi | Net billing | Mississippi PSC rule | 2015-12 | 2.5¢ | DSIRE list |
| Missouri | Avoided cost | Net Metering and Easy Connection Act | 2007 | — | DSIRE list |
| Montana | Full-retail net metering | MCA 69-8-601 | 1999 | — | DSIRE list |
| Nebraska | Full-retail net metering | LB 436 | 2009 | — | DSIRE list |
| Nevada | Net billing | AB 405 tiered excess energy credit | 2017-06-15 | — | source |
| New Hampshire | Net billing | Net Metering 2.0 (SB 129) | 2017 | — | DSIRE list |
| New Jersey | Full-retail net metering (verify) | N.J.A.C. 14:8-4 | long-standing | — | source |
| New Mexico | Full-retail net metering | 17.9.570.14 NMAC | long-standing | — | source |
| New York | Full-retail net metering | Phase One net metering + VDER Value Stack | VDER | — | source |
| North Carolina | Net billing | Residential Solar Choice (RSC) | 2023-10-01 | — | source |
| North Dakota | Avoided cost | 69-09-07 Small Power Production | long-standing | — | DSIRE list |
| Ohio | Net billing | OAC 4901:1-10-28 | long-standing | — | source |
| Oklahoma | Avoided cost | 17 O.S. 156 | long-standing | — | DSIRE list |
| Oregon | Full-retail net metering | OAR 860-039-0055 | long-standing | — | source |
| Pennsylvania | Full-retail net metering | 52 Pa. Code | long-standing | — | source |
| Rhode Island | Full-retail net metering | Net metering + Renewable Energy Growth | 2011 | — | DSIRE list |
| South Carolina | Net billing | Solar Choice Metering (Act 62) | 2021-06-01 | — | DSIRE list |
| South Dakota | No export compensation | PURPA small power purchase only | n/a | — | DSIRE list |
| Tennessee | Utility-dependent (no statewide rule) (verify) | TVA Green Connect, administered by local power companies | unverified | — | DSIRE list |
| Texas | Utility-dependent (no statewide rule) | REP solar buyback plans | no state requirement | 3.0¢ | DSIRE list |
| Utah | Net billing | Rocky Mountain Power Export Credit Rate | 2026-03-01 | 4.4¢ | source |
| Vermont | Net billing | PUC Rule 5.100 | 2026-08-01 | 14.398¢ | DSIRE list |
| Virginia | Full-retail net metering | Dominion Net Metering 2.0 | 2026-04-30 | — | DSIRE list |
| Washington | Full-retail net metering | RCW 80.60 | sunset approaching | — | source |
| West Virginia | Net billing | W.Va. Code 24-2F-8 | 2025-01-01 / 2026-03-01 | 10.85¢ | DSIRE list |
| Wisconsin | Utility-dependent (no statewide rule) | utility-specific parallel generation tariffs | ongoing | — | DSIRE list |
| Wyoming | Full-retail net metering | W.S. 37-16-101 | long-standing | — | DSIRE list |
Rows marked (verify) carry a low-confidence flag in our records — the classification is our best read of the primary document, and the source link is the place to confirm. Where the export column shows — the rule publishes no single statewide rate; this site’s model then uses the disclosed default shares (30% of retail for net billing, 25% for avoided cost) rather than pretending to precision.
How to read the four regimes
Full retail — every exported kWh is credited at the same rate you’d pay to buy it. The simplest regime and, all else equal, the fastest payback: a kWh sent out is worth exactly what a kWh pulled in costs.
Net billing — exports are credited below retail, at a published per-kWh figure or, where none exists, at an assumed share of retail stated plainly on this site. Every exported kWh is worth less than a retail kWh, which slows payback even when the sun and the rate are both good.
Avoided cost — exports are credited near what the utility would have paid to generate or buy that power itself, generally the lowest of the compensated regimes.
None — no export compensation. The economics only work through self-consumption or a battery; sending power to the grid for free is the honest baseline.
Why the regime moves payback more than sunshine
A state with mediocre sun and full-retail exports routinely beats a sunnier state stuck on avoided cost, because payback is a dollar question first — the site’s own 50-state payback ranking shows it directly: New York’s high rate plus full-retail exports outpaces sunnier, cheaper-power states by a wide margin. For your own roof, state pricing plus the savings calculator runs the number under your state’s actual rule, and net metering, explained covers the billing mechanics.
Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) electricity rates · DSIRE incentive records · public IRS/OBBBA guidance. Figures are modeled estimates, not quotes or tax advice. See our methodology.
Where to go next
- Solar panel cost by state — Local pricing and payback under each state’s actual regime.
- Net metering, explained — How each regime is structured and billed, mechanically.
- 2026 solar savings calculator — Run your own roof against your state’s real export rule.